The picture that the public has of residential communities in this country very much on the media marked. Journal articles completely clueless journalists report about a property full of sound in belächelndem freaked Alternative, students in permanent party atmosphere and especially the supposedly only in WGs acute problem of cleanliness. Books on residential communities to enter into the same footsteps, telling endless anecdotes and funny residential community typify WGs in a remarkably uniform way: since there are always cited as the archetypes of "purpose-WG", "cereal-WG", "Women-WG", "men-flat" or even "gay-WG.
Factual reporting is selling just getting worse as certain to inflame the reader's imagination. All contributions should share the smug tone and the obligatory introduction in which the supposed origins of residential communities, namely the municipalities in the 60s and 70s are broadly met. The eternal attempt to find in shared visibility issues adjusted, the view of reality.
And so the living style residential community the public never the stink of "alternative" and "students" or "dormitory" got rid of. Only very rarely do you hear something about "old residential communities" or clever normal people in high-quality flats, of which one could only dream of as a single tenant. On
best, you very quickly forget the prejudices report of which the mass media. For example, it was already in the twenties living communities for today still known pattern. And, oh wonder, many people live quite well running communities of different origins, even with different interests, feel good about it and not even argue each week over the dirty Dishes. Probably the percentage of residential communities to really break the controversy and anger is about as high as the divorce rate of married couples.
text source: haiku plus.de, image: Wikipedia
0 comments:
Post a Comment